If you only do one thing this week, read your sector’s Skills Needs Assessment. If you do five things, do these.
The Skills England Annual Skills Report 2026 was published at 8am on Monday 1 June, alongside 10 Sectoral Skills Needs Assessments. The full breakdown is in our pillar guide. This piece is the action list, the five concrete moves that turn a 1.5 megabyte PDF into a sharp meeting agenda.
Read your sector’s Skills Needs Assessment (20 minutes)
Skills England published a 20 to 28 page assessment for each of the ten priority sectors. Find yours, skim the executive summary, then go straight to the “Influence of AI” chapter (it is consistently the most useful section for L&D planning).
What you are looking for: the named priority occupations, the projected growth and replacement demand, the qualification level required for new roles (this is often 90 percent or more at Level 4), and the AI skills domains called out (technical, non-technical, responsible and ethical).
Map your roles against the priority occupations (30 minutes)
Open the priority occupations table from your SNA. Print or screenshot it. Walk through your org chart and tick which of your roles fall into which priority occupation. The roles that do not fit cleanly are the ones to watch, they are the ones where job design may be shifting fastest.
Skills England’s headline finding across the assessments is consistent: digital and engineering roles are the cross-sector winners, demand is rising sharply, and most growth is at Level 4 or above. If a meaningful share of your headcount sits in those categories, you have a Level 4 conversation to have.
Audit current training spend against named gaps (1 hour)
Look at where your training money has gone in the last 12 months. Mark each spend item against (a) which named priority occupation it serves and (b) which of the three AI skill domains it builds: technical, non-technical, or responsible & ethical. The spend that does not connect to either is the spend to defend, or stop.
This is the audit that often unlocks levy. Many employers under-use the apprenticeship levy because they are funding short courses out of training budget when the same outcome could come from a levy-funded apprenticeship or apprenticeship unit. The Skills England report makes the case for AU0009/10/11 leadership units explicitly.
Pick one priority and book the conversation (15 minutes)
Do not try to address all five Skills England challenges this quarter. Pick the one your business has the largest, most defensible gap on, and book a 30-minute scoping call with a provider who can map the funded options against your levy pot.
For most UK employers, that priority is the AI skills gap (Skills England’s third system-level challenge, and the one accelerating fastest). The funded answers are the Level 4 AI & Automation Practitioner apprenticeship and the AU0009/10/11 leadership unit family.
Brief your sponsor with one slide (10 minutes)
If you have a board sponsor, exec or budget owner, send them one slide this week. Three lines.
- Skills England’s 2026 report names our sector as a priority. The named skills gap in our function is [X].
- The funded answer is [Y]. We can run it on the levy for [Z] learners. First cohort starts [date].
- If we wait for the next iteration of the report, we lose 12 months. Recommendation: scope a cohort by end of this quarter.
That is enough. Sponsors do not need 56 pages, they need to see you have read the 56 pages and have a defensible move.
What TESS Group can do this week
If you want help with any of the five steps, we can:
• Read your SNA with you and pull out the priorities relevant to your function, free of charge, in a 30-minute call.
• Run a quick levy audit and tell you what is sitting in your pot that is at risk of expiring.
• Scope a cohort using the open, closed or hybrid model that fits your team size and operation.
• Provide the one-page sponsor brief for finance or exec sign-off.
Map your team against Skills England 2026 in 30 minutes
Tell us your sector and the size of your team. We will walk you through the named priorities, the funded routes, and what good looks like for your first cohort.
Wider context
The deeper version of this analysis, with the sector-by-sector mapping and the headline numbers, is in our priority-sectors pillar guide. The cohort delivery question (open vs closed vs hybrid) is covered in the cohort models guide. The levy mechanics are in the levy explainer.